Organic Reserve Habano Pig Stub (4.5″x60) 5 Pack
Original price was: $40.00.$24.99Current price is: $24.99.
Organic Reserve Habano Pig Stub 4.5″ x 60
100% Organic • Four Years in the Making • Small Batch Production
Bold, rich, and packed with flavor — the Organic Reserve Habano Stub is the perfect short smoke for those who appreciate a heavy-hitting, medium-bodied experience in a smaller format.
At 4.5″ x 60, this chunky, stubby cigar delivers all the boldness of a full-sized stick in a shorter, more intense burn. Wrapped in a dark, oily Nicaraguan Habano 2000 wrapper, with a robust filler blend of Nicaraguan, Dominican, and a touch of Peruvian leaf, each draw is full of earthy cocoa, spiced sweetness, and a smooth, clean finish.
We don’t cut corners here. Deep-freezing our tobacco instead of using pesticides ensures a chemical-free experience, from the farm to your hands.
What You’re Getting:
- Cap: Pig Tail
- Wrapper: Nicaraguan Habano 2000
- Filler: Nicaragua • Dominican • Peruvian
- Size: 4.5″ x 60 (Stub)
- Strength: Medium-bodied
- Handmade in Estelí, Nicaragua
- Quantity: 5 Pack
A perfect pick for those who enjoy a deep, rich smoke without the wait.
In stock
| Title | Range | Discount |
|---|---|---|
| (QTY PRICE BREAKS - 5 PACKS) | 2 - 10 | 10% |
Organic Reserve Habano Pig Stub (4.5″x60)
Why Smoke Organic Reserve Habano ?
- Fully organic & chemical-free
- Crafted over 4 years from seed to cigar
- Deep-frozen for natural pest protection
- Limited production – only 4,000 cigars in this second release
The Organic Reserve Habano 4.5″x60 isn’t just a cigar—it’s a statement. A tribute to tradition. A return to how cigars were meant to be.
61 reviews for Organic Reserve Habano Pig Stub (4.5″x60) 5 Pack
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Free Shipping $150 or More For U.S. States. Canada $72.99
Related products
fulton (verified owner) –
Organic Reserve Habanos are the way to go, better than the Mads
Andrew Z. (verified owner) –
The aftertaste didn’t sit heavily on my palate. With the finish staying fairly clean, I was happy to have another from the pack to try on a later occasion.
Mike U. (verified owner) –
The five-pack let me get acquainted with the compact shape without changing sizes between sessions. My clearest recurring note was toasted bread crust.
Carlos D. (verified owner) –
My main impression wasn’t sweetness or strength, but a clear wood aroma. The flavor had a quieter cashew-like note that developed behind it.
Natalie L. (verified owner) –
I alternated shorter and longer pauses to see what changed. The Habano Stub tasted nuttier when I gave it a little more time between draws.
Elizabeth R. (verified owner) –
The opening had a bite. It became better balanced afterward, without repeated burn corrections. The remaining cigars gave me an opportunity to revisit it.
Mark F. (verified owner) –
The five-pack let me get acquainted with this shorter shape. A little sweetness followed the clear wood flavor, and an unhurried pace kept the finish from overheating.
Brandon P. (verified owner) –
My first impression was of toast rather than pepper. The spice showed up afterward, adding a dry edge instead of covering the nutty middle.
Anthony Y. (verified owner) –
Slowing down revealed a quiet nutty note. The session was solid overall, but I wanted the finish to be cleaner, which held it at four stars for me.
Vanessa C. (verified owner) –
Around the middle, a mild sweetness appeared without becoming sugary. Taking care to light the foot evenly was followed by a stable burn.
Kevin T. (verified owner) –
A slight resistance in the draw matched my preference. The shorter body was comfortable to hold, and the taste leaned toward wood and toast rather than dark sweetness.
Danielle X. (verified owner) –
The compact body got into its main flavor fairly quickly. For me, that was dry cedar with a restrained pepper note trailing behind.
Jennifer Y. (verified owner) –
Two of these showed a clear bread-crust flavor after the first few draws. The spice was present, but it never became the only thing I tasted.
Amy V. (verified owner) –
The taste began with spice and developed a warmer, rounder character afterward. I got more from that change by taking my time with it.
Julia D. (verified owner) –
The middle brought a restrained sweetness that I liked, but the finish felt a little dry. I enjoyed the shorter format more than expected, with that finish keeping it at four stars.
Michelle V. (verified owner) –
The wrapper held neatly around my cut while the Stub shortened. I noticed more toasted grain than creaminess, which suited my taste.
Lauren B. (verified owner) –
The Habano version gave me more of a baked-bread aroma than I expected. On the palate, the cedar stayed clearer than the bread.
Tim L. (verified owner) –
The ash on my first Habano Stub released cleanly when tapped. A slight pepper finish followed an otherwise mild-tasting combination of wood and toasted nuts.
Carlos K. (verified owner) –
The short Habano held its structure even after I removed the band. A little creamy texture appeared late without changing the savory flavor much.
Brian Y. (verified owner) –
I found the Stub easy to balance in hand, especially compared with longer shapes. The flavor stayed more woody than creamy throughout my first session.
Laura K. (verified owner) –
Cedar and spice were in the proportion I’d been hoping for. I found the Stub compact in a considered way, not as though it were missing something.
Thomas S. (verified owner) –
Spice marked the start, then warmer wood became more prominent. I found the short body comfortable rather than awkward to hold.
Lisa U. (verified owner) –
Toast outlasted pepper in the aftertaste. That detail helped the shorter format leave a better impression on me than I expected.
Steve K. (verified owner) –
The Habano Stub began with a warm cedar impression on my palate. Toasted nuts appeared quickly, giving the short format more detail than I expected.
Heather Q. (verified owner) –
The compact shape fit the break I had planned. A light earthiness balanced wood and spice, while the construction held together without needing regular attention.
Alex F. (verified owner) –
I paid attention to the finish on the third Stub from the pack. Toast lasted longer than the little pepper tingle, which changed my overall impression.
Paul H. (verified owner) –
Cedar and toast shared the flavor with a noticeable touch of spice. The burn remained even enough that I saw no reason to bring the lighter back out.
Paul T. (verified owner) –
There was a little browned-butter impression through the middle of my second Stub. It rounded out the toast without making the taste especially sweet.
Tim I. (verified owner) –
Once the opening passed, the flavor felt less pointed and more rounded. My particular sample also burned without needing much management.
Carol I. (verified owner) –
The second cigar had a rounder texture than the first. The basic flavor was similar, with a dry woody note and just a trace of sweetness.
Carol O. (verified owner) –
I liked the way the short Habano rested between my fingers. The smoke felt soft even though the flavor had a distinct woody edge.
Steve L. (verified owner) –
As pepper faded, the nuttier side became easier to recognize. I liked having another cigar in the pack available to return to later.
Vanessa M. (verified owner) –
The five Stubs felt fairly uniform when I checked them in hand. The one I chose drew comfortably and gave a mellow toasted aftertaste.
Richard V. (verified owner) –
The last part of one cigar felt a little dry on my palate. I preferred the earlier mix of warm toast and gentle nuttiness.
Ashley X. (verified owner) –
Pepper made itself known but didn’t drown out everything around it. I’d put a draw this dependable ahead of elaborate presentation.
Natalie C. (verified owner) –
The five-pack made the subtle differences easier to compare. One cigar leaned almond, another leaned cedar, but both had a dry bread-like finish.
Diana E. (verified owner) –
I don’t usually choose this format, so five was an appropriate amount to try. The opening had an edge, but balance improved as the draw eased after those first puffs.
Greg S. (verified owner) –
One of the Stubs needed a brief relight after a pause. The nutty flavor returned without much change, although I would have preferred fewer interruptions.
Greg X. (verified owner) –
I tried the first two on different afternoons and found both more savory than sweet. The second showed a little creaminess behind the wood.
Vanessa S. (verified owner) –
I usually miss delicate nut flavors, but they were fairly obvious here. They came through once the opening cedar became less prominent.
Scott A. (verified owner) –
There was enough energy in the spice to notice it, without harshness running through the whole smoke. The pack provided a helpful introduction to the Stub.
John P. (verified owner) –
Roasted nuts emerged a few minutes into this small format. It felt complete despite its size and stayed intact even when I went lower than my normal stopping point.
Sarah M. (verified owner) –
My first cigar had a cleaner cap cut than I expected from the small format. Airflow was even, and a faint nuttiness lingered after the cedar.
Kimberly J. (verified owner) –
Five made sense for a format outside my usual choices. Warm cedar persisted from midway onward, and setting the cigar down between draws didn’t put it out.
Dan O. (verified owner) –
I didn’t have to pull hard on the two Stubs I’ve tried. That made it easier to keep a slow rhythm and notice the quiet nutty flavors.
Ashley E. (verified owner) –
A faint grassy edge appeared early and then gave way to warm wood. I found that small transition more memorable than the spice itself.
Diana R. (verified owner) –
I found the second cigar in the pack a little less spicy than the first. Both had the same warm, bready finish that stood out to me.
Patrick O. (verified owner) –
Warm wood and modest pepper made for a fairly easygoing profile. The compact format held together without much tending, and this pack was enough to get acquainted with it.
Matthew W. (verified owner) –
Toasted bread paired with cedar was the combination I noticed here. After lighting, the cigar largely took care of itself.
Matthew P. (verified owner) –
The opening was brighter than the middle, with the flavor gradually becoming more toasted. It was a small shift that suited the shorter size.
Jennifer N. (verified owner) –
The first Stub had a fairly active opening, but the spice didn’t stay dominant. A dry almond-like taste became easier to notice as it went along.
Daniel D. (verified owner) –
On the last Stub I tried, the woodiness softened into something almost cereal-like. That gentler finish stood out against the lively opening.
Jennifer I. (verified owner) –
The shorter Habano had enough development to avoid feeling abrupt. Toast and pepper traded places, with neither completely covering the other.
Megan D. (verified owner) –
I noticed a touch of floral aroma while the second Stub rested. It didn’t dominate the taste, which remained mostly toasted wood and nuts.
Carlos G. (verified owner) –
A slightly tight draw kept my first cigar from being completely effortless. The next was easier, and both had the cedar character I was expecting.
Andrew P. (verified owner) –
I noticed the aroma was breadier than the flavor on my first try. The taste leaned toward cedar with a soft, nutty undertone.
Megan G. (verified owner) –
My main impressions were wood, toast, and a smaller nutty element. The shorter length also rested comfortably in my hand.
Katherine M. (verified owner) –
Under the brighter spice was a more subdued nuttiness. The Stub delivered that contrast in a compact shape that still felt complete.
Lisa N. (verified owner) –
The first one finished with a dry cedar taste rather than a wave of pepper. That was different from what its spicy opening had suggested.
Julia S. (verified owner) –
The pack gave me another chance to identify a note I couldn’t place initially. On the second Stub, it reminded me of roasted hazelnut.
Jennifer B. (verified owner) –
A spicy opening developed into a warmer, rounder taste while the wrapper remained intact for the rest of the session.