Organic Reserve Habano Pig Toro (6″x52) 5 Pack
Original price was: $40.00.$24.99Current price is: $24.99.
Organic Reserve Habano Pig Toro
100% Organic • 4 Years in the Making • Small Batch
Short, stout, and packed with rich, earthy flavor — the Organic Reserve Habano Toro delivers everything you’d expect from a cigar crafted with care, patience, and zero chemicals.
This 6″x52 Toro features a dark, naturally aged Nicaraguan Habano 2000 wrapper, hugging a well-balanced blend of Nicaraguan, Dominican, and a pinch of Peruvian filler tobacco. The result? A medium bodied smoke with notes of dark cocoa, earth, and a touch of natural sweetness that lingers just right.
We don’t use pesticides. Instead, we deep-freeze our tobacco to naturally eliminate pests—keeping things pure from soil to cigar.
What You’re Getting:
- Cap: Pig Tail
- Wrapper: Nicaraguan Habano 2000
- Filler: Nicaraguan, Dominican, and a pinch of Peruvian leaf
- Binder: Nicaraguan
- Size: 6″ x 52 Toro
- Strength: Medium
- 4,000 Cigars Only – Second Small Batch 2026 Release
- Handmade in Estelí, Nicaragua
- Quantity of 5
If you like your cigars bold, clean, and never rushed, this one’s for you.
In stock
| Title | Range | Discount |
|---|---|---|
| (QTY PRICE BREAKS - 5 PACKS) | 2 - 10 | 10% |
Organic Reserve Habano Pig Toro
Why Smoke Organic Reserve Habano ?
- Fully organic & chemical-free
- Crafted over 4 years from seed to cigar
- Deep-frozen for natural pest protection
- Limited production – only 4,000 cigars in this second release
The Organic Reserve Habano Toro isn’t just a cigar—it’s a statement. A tribute to tradition. A return to how cigars were meant to be.
60 reviews for Organic Reserve Habano Pig Toro (6″x52) 5 Pack
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Free Shipping $150 or More For U.S. States. Canada $72.99
Related products
Russ J. (verified owner) –
My notes on the pack’s second cigar mentioned cashew rather than almond. The woodiness was similar, but that small difference caught my attention.
Amanda T. (verified owner) –
The spice had character without making the entire smoke harsh. Once the cigar was lit, it required little more attention from me.
Thomas I. (verified owner) –
I noticed the aroma softening before the actual flavor did. The early dry wood gradually picked up a gentler, bready edge.
Brian V. (verified owner) –
The dry wood appealed to me more than the pepper at the beginning. Having several of the same format let me compare that preference across separate sessions.
Steve Z. (verified owner) –
My second impression was less about pepper and more about aroma. The resting Toro gave off a warm cedar scent with a faint floral trace.
James M. (verified owner) –
I tasted more savory character than sweetness, which is my usual preference. An evenly lit foot led to a consistent burn, while the pack kept my first Toro purchase limited.
Amber R. (verified owner) –
The Habano Toro seemed to gain definition as I slowed down. Almond and cedar became separate impressions instead of one broadly woody flavor.
Anthony R. (verified owner) –
The second cigar from the pack felt slightly firmer but didn’t draw tighter. The toasted-bread note was clear from early in the session.
Kelly N. (verified owner) –
The Habano Toros felt familiar in hand without seeming oversized. My first one moved from dry wood toward a warmer, slightly creamy middle.
Sarah H. (verified owner) –
Behind the wood, I could taste a warmer, bread-like note. Five cigars felt like a manageable departure from what I usually keep in rotation.
Dean Y. (verified owner) –
The two I’ve tried handled a careful band removal without losing wrapper. Both left a toasted-grain taste after the initial pepper faded.
Eric U. (verified owner) –
Taking longer pauses kept the smoke cool. Wood stayed clear in the flavor, with slight sweetness behind it, and I had more than one cigar left to revisit.
Brian K. (verified owner) –
I recorded cedar twice in my notes, once for aroma and once for taste. The aroma was gentler, while the taste had a drier edge.
Allison K. (verified owner) –
The five cigars had some natural-looking differences in leaf shade. The two I smoked were similar in texture and had the same dry cedar finish.
Rebecca L. (verified owner) –
I found a modest sweetness in the middle, rather than anything sugary. Pausing between puffs suited it, and the smaller quantity made trying an unfamiliar choice easier.
Christina P. (verified owner) –
The pack’s third Toro was my clearest example of the nutty side. Pepper stayed quiet enough that I could keep following that detail.
Erin Y. (verified owner) –
I found the pack helpful for checking whether that nutty note was just my first impression. It showed up again on the next Toro.
Christine F. (verified owner) –
Pepper was prominent without hiding every other note. The last stretch was sharper than what came before it, though, which makes this a four-star impression for me.
Jessica S. (verified owner) –
I found a nuttier finish when I slowed my pace. Very little intervention was necessary after the initial light, which let me focus on that change.
John L. (verified owner) –
The final third on one cigar became too dry for my taste. I preferred its middle, where the nutty flavor and softer texture came together.
Richard Y. (verified owner) –
I found a little sweetness in the middle of my first Toro, but not enough to call it a sweet cigar. Wood stayed dominant.
Kevin J. (verified owner) –
The five-pack gave me several chances to follow the finish. It tended to shift from warm bread toward a quieter dry-nut impression.
Melissa J. (verified owner) –
I was surprised by how much of the flavor lingered between puffs. A soft almond-like taste stayed after the pepper had already faded.
Stephanie P. (verified owner) –
The quieter flavors could still be tasted through the spice. I appreciated the way the cigar sat in my hand as much as its smoking behavior.
Robert K. (verified owner) –
Starting with an even light produced a steady burn. Cedar remained warm and noticeable from the middle onward, with enough cigars in the pack to compare separate evenings.
Carlos L. (verified owner) –
There was a faint floral edge to the aroma on my second cigar. The taste stayed savory, with toasted grain clearer than sweetness.
Scott S. (verified owner) –
I compared two from this pack using the same cut. Their airflow was close, but the second had a more distinct roasted-almond finish.
Rebecca J. (verified owner) –
I let the first cigar rest between puffs and noticed a toasted aroma hanging around it. The flavor itself was drier and more cedar-led.
Joseph G. (verified owner) –
Having several of the same size made small differences noticeable. My third cigar showed more creaminess through the middle than the first two.
Brandon C. (verified owner) –
As the pepper stepped back, the nutty element came forward. The cigar needed minimal tending once lit, and the pack let me assess the Toro without a larger commitment.
David D. (verified owner) –
An early spicy note developed into warmer wood. I avoided pushing the pace, and the finish didn’t get hot on me.
Jennifer A. (verified owner) –
The burn wandered on one of the Toros and needed a touch of flame. I liked the bread-and-nut flavor, but that kept the session from being effortless.
Carlos R. (verified owner) –
The middle combined roasted nuts with a mildly creamy texture. I liked the Toro’s feel in my hand and found the pack quantity appropriate.
Melissa A. (verified owner) –
The opening felt lively rather than sharp, but the pepper continued at a higher level than I personally wanted. That difference in preference puts it at four stars for me.
Nicole N. (verified owner) –
Cedar together with toasted bread was what I liked most about the flavor. The pack size made trying something different from my normal rotation straightforward.
Natalie V. (verified owner) –
The Toro’s length let the shift from cedar to toasted nuts happen without feeling rushed. The last part was woodier again on mine.
Mike G. (verified owner) –
As the airflow eased after the initial puffs, I found myself preferring the dry wood that followed the opening pepper.
Richard H. (verified owner) –
A shallow cut suited the first cigar better than the larger opening I used on the second. Both had a pleasant warm-toast character.
Carlos X. (verified owner) –
The Toros I tried stayed intact near the cap as they shortened. Their flavor moved at a steady pace from wood toward warmer nuts.
Chris X. (verified owner) –
Toast remained easy to taste despite the pepper adding some energy. The format felt right for a relaxed session without an awkward amount of cigar to handle.
Daniel J. (verified owner) –
Airflow was easier after the beginning. That made the session more comfortable. The finish then picked up more spice than I’d noticed in the middle.
Jessica U. (verified owner) –
I compared the first and last notes from two sessions with this pack. Both began with cedar and ended with a distinct, slightly nutty toast.
Lauren E. (verified owner) –
I found the pack’s overall character fairly consistent without being identical. Cedar connected the sessions, while the amount of toasted-nut flavor varied.
Tony E. (verified owner) –
Savory flavors outweighed sweetness, as I usually prefer. A small pack was a manageable way to step outside my regular rotation.
Frank Q. (verified owner) –
I liked the middle’s roasted-nut flavor and faint creaminess. The cigar also stayed together when I smoked it beyond the length where I normally stop.
Lauren U. (verified owner) –
I tried the second cigar without a flavored drink nearby. A small creamy impression became more obvious, though the underlying taste remained savory.
Alex H. (verified owner) –
The ash on the first Toro held together better than its flaky appearance suggested. Its flavor stayed savory, with an occasional hint of warm cereal.
Rachel W. (verified owner) –
Five cigars gave me the first look at this size that I needed. Flavor increased a little around the middle instead of disappearing, and I valued the reliable draw over decoration.
Angela O. (verified owner) –
The finish didn’t leave a weighty coating of flavor behind. This quantity also let me try the Toro without taking on more than five cigars.
Jason B. (verified owner) –
I tend to favor savory over sweet, and this followed that preference. After the first Toro, having a few remaining in the pack was welcome.
Chris T. (verified owner) –
The first Toro had a gentle bread-crust aroma before cedar took over. I found the pepper more noticeable in the aftertaste than during the draw.
Nick J. (verified owner) –
The first cigar’s cap stayed neat through the session. A warm cedar flavor carried most of it, with a little pepper entering later.
Anthony C. (verified owner) –
The first Habano Toro had a finish that reminded me of lightly browned bread. It was a quieter note than the woody opening.
Stephanie T. (verified owner) –
These Toros had a lighter-tasting opening than I expected. The flavor gained a bread-like depth as the smoke became softer in texture.
Michelle Y. (verified owner) –
A toasted-grain flavor was the part I particularly liked. The Toro’s shape was comfortable to hold, and the five-pack matched the quantity I had in mind.
Eric X. (verified owner) –
A little pepper arrived after the initial toast rather than before it. That order gave the opening a softer character than I had anticipated.
Mark O. (verified owner) –
The texture became rounder once the first inch was past. That made the toasted-grain taste easier to recognize against the dry wood.
Chris J. (verified owner) –
My first Toro had a brief grassy note at the start that passed quickly. Afterward, it was mostly warm wood and a little toasted sweetness.
Kevin O. (verified owner) –
One Toro began with slightly uneven airflow and needed patience. It improved, although I preferred the easier draw on the next one from the pack.
Lauren I. (verified owner) –
The taste rounded out after the opening settled. I kept my pace leisurely and the smoke stayed cool; five cigars felt manageable for trying something outside my usual lineup.