Organic Reserve Maduro Pig (6″x60) 5 Pack
Original price was: $40.00.$24.99Current price is: $24.99.
Organic Reserve Maduro Pig Gordo
100% Organic • 4 Years in the Making • Small Batch
Bold, balanced, and packed with rich, earthy flavor — the Organic Reserve Maduro Gordo delivers everything you’d expect from a cigar crafted with care, patience, and zero chemicals.
This 6″ x 60 Gordo features a, naturally aged Light Colorado Maduro Wrapper, hugging a well-balanced blend of Nicaraguan, Dominican, and a pinch of Peruvian filler tobacco. The result? A medium bodied smoke with notes of dark cocoa, earth, and a touch of natural sweetness that lingers just right.
We don’t use pesticides. Instead, we deep-freeze our tobacco to naturally eliminate pests—keeping things pure from soil to cigar.
What You’re Getting:
- Cap: Pig Tail
- Wrapper: Light Colorado Maduro
- Filler: Nicaraguan, Dominican, and a pinch of Peruvian leaf
- Binder: Nicaraguan
- Size: 6″ x 60 (Gordo)
- Strength: Medium
- 4,000 Cigars Only – Second Small Batch 2026 Release
- Handmade in Estelí, Nicaragua
- Quantity of 5
If you like your cigars bold, clean, and never rushed, this one’s for you.
In stock
| Title | Range | Discount |
|---|---|---|
| (QTY PRICE BREAKS - 5 PACKS) | 2 - 10 | 10% |
Organic Reserve Maduro Pig (6″x60)
Why Smoke Organic Reserve Maduro?
- Fully organic & chemical-free
- Crafted over 4 years from seed to cigar
- Deep-frozen for natural pest protection
- Limited production – only 4,000 cigars in this second release
The Organic Reserve Maduro 6×60 isn’t just a cigar—it’s a statement. A tribute to tradition. A return to how cigars were meant to be.
61 reviews for Organic Reserve Maduro Pig (6″x60) 5 Pack
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Free Shipping $150 or More For U.S. States. Canada $72.99
Related products
Henry A (verified owner) –
I thought it might be overhyped, but it’s genuinely solid.
Laura N. (verified owner) –
The 6 x 60 finished with wood and a little pepper after a mostly cocoa-led session. Having the other cigars made that progression worth noting carefully.
Adam W. (verified owner) –
The first two from this pack had similar airflow. The flavor on mine leaned toward dark roast rather than the sweeter chocolate I had anticipated.
Russ X. (verified owner) –
Around halfway, the flavor picked up a roasted-nut element. I appreciated trying the larger size in this quantity before deciding about anything beyond the pack.
Richard C. (verified owner) –
Five was a useful number for finding out how I felt about the larger dimensions. The flavor was rounded instead of pointed, and the cigar stayed lit during pauses.
Victoria I. (verified owner) –
The first puffs were a little restricted, but the draw soon eased. Pepper at the start yielded to coffee and earth; five cigars gave me a reasonable look at the larger size.
Carol N. (verified owner) –
Steadiness mattered more here than frequent flavor changes; roast stayed at the center. The pack was a practical way to judge whether these larger proportions suited me.
Nick E. (verified owner) –
The flavor shifted noticeably toward wood by the finish. With several left in the pack, I could return another evening and pay attention to that progression again.
Alex U. (verified owner) –
Earth and dark cocoa filled most of my notes on this one. I took my time with the substantial 6 x 60 and didn’t encounter a burn that needed fussing over.
Kelly W. (verified owner) –
Coffee was clearer to me than chocolate. The finish had a mild sweetness, and the sample felt free of loose or soft spots. There were more in the pack to revisit later.
Holly Z. (verified owner) –
There was plenty to taste without a cutting edge to it. I also noticed that the ash lasted longer than my first impression of it suggested.
Jason M. (verified owner) –
On the second cigar from the pack, I noticed more wood in the aroma than in the flavor. The taste itself stayed firmly on the earthy side.
Angela W. (verified owner) –
One cigar in this pack developed an uneven edge that needed correcting twice. I liked the dark roast flavor, but the burn kept me involved.
Joseph J. (verified owner) –
I set aside time for the substantial 6 x 60 and noticed a roasted-nut note near the end.
Dan B. (verified owner) –
The darker flavors stayed separate enough to identify. Having a few more in the pack meant that impression wasn’t something I had to leave at one evening.
George R. (verified owner) –
The lasting coffee flavor avoided bitterness. I wanted to be seated and give this one time, not squeeze it into a rushed break.
Jennifer M. (verified owner) –
The wider foot took some patience, but I didn’t need to keep touching it up. A slight earthy sweetness stayed underneath the coffee taste.
James K. (verified owner) –
I tried another from the pack before deciding what to write. Both had a nutty middle section, with the second finishing a little woodier.
Carol B. (verified owner) –
The 6 x 60’s draw had a comfortable amount of resistance after a shallow cut. There was plenty of aroma even when I wasn’t puffing.
Julie A. (verified owner) –
Earthiness and dark cocoa were the parts I liked. The final stretch got warmer than I prefer, and that held my score to four.
Amber H. (verified owner) –
The darker flavor matched what I’d hoped for from the wrapper’s appearance. I also had more than one evening available to assess it, thanks to the remaining cigars.
Greg Z. (verified owner) –
The 6 x 60 felt a little bulky for my usual preference. The roast-and-earth combination was enjoyable, though I had to adjust how I held it.
Adam Y. (verified owner) –
The pack let me revisit the bigger shape without changing blends. On the second attempt, I noticed a quieter pepper finish behind the earthy taste.
Alex Y. (verified owner) –
My first and second cigars differed most in the opening spice. Once past that, both settled into the same dry cocoa and wood territory.
Megan S. (verified owner) –
The wide format gave the different roast notes room to separate on my palate. I could distinguish bread crust from coffee instead of tasting one dark blur.
Andrew I. (verified owner) –
There was an almost leathery quality through the middle of the first 6 x 60. It added something different from the coffee-heavy opening.
Mark C. (verified owner) –
My first 6 x 60 stayed consistent enough that I stopped watching the burn. Cocoa kept returning in small amounts throughout the woodier second half.
Marty Q. (verified owner) –
A nutty hint showed up between the cocoa and pepper. The burn stayed predictable enough that I stopped paying much attention to it.
Melissa M. (verified owner) –
The larger body felt substantial without making the draw a struggle. What remained on my palate afterward was more walnut skin than sweetness.
Samantha O. (verified owner) –
It gave me a roasted taste without crossing over into burnt. The five-pack also meant I could return to the format on a different evening.
Erin P. (verified owner) –
The mildly sweet part didn’t crowd out the roast, or vice versa. Trying that balance in the larger format before committing to more suited me.
Peter I. (verified owner) –
I liked the way the ash held across the broad foot. The smoke tasted dry and roasted, with occasional hints of something slightly malty.
Alex L. (verified owner) –
The wider Maduro didn’t race through its changes. Toast gradually replaced pepper, and later the darker coffee impression became more apparent.
Chris P. (verified owner) –
I found the larger Maduro slower to show its sweeter side. A faint molasses impression appeared well into the session and then slipped behind the earth again.
Allison S. (verified owner) –
On the finish I noticed a touch of sweetness behind the coffee, with chocolate further back. How it felt in my hand mattered to me as much as the smoke itself.
Danielle F. (verified owner) –
Coffee was strongest, with something toasted underneath it. The cigar kept its shape and carried on without my having to manage it constantly.
Christina T. (verified owner) –
Unsweetened cocoa and earth came through together. The cigar felt consistently packed when I checked it, with neither looseness nor a noticeably soft patch.
Sarah V. (verified owner) –
The coffee flavor seemed deeper with this wider format, at least on my palate. It never became the outright sweetness I associate with dessert-like notes.
Rachel U. (verified owner) –
I left this larger Maduro for an evening without interruptions. The change from cocoa to dry wood was gradual enough to appreciate at that pace.
Natalie P. (verified owner) –
I expected a fairly blunt flavor from the size, but there were quieter details. A light bread-crust note stayed beneath the roasted core.
Jeff N. (verified owner) –
I noticed a faint creamy impression during the middle third of my second cigar. The flavor remained earthy, just less dry in texture.
Andrew J. (verified owner) –
I let the remaining cigars sit while I thought about the first one. Its finish had an interesting contrast of dry walnut and restrained cocoa.
Jeff D. (verified owner) –
The coffee aftertaste was lasting and free of bitterness. Still, the profile changed less than I would have preferred, which is why I settled on four stars.
Greg M. (verified owner) –
Coffee and toasted wood overlapped around the middle. The wrapper stayed intact from the start of the session to the point where I finished.
Joseph E. (verified owner) –
The dimensions looked more imposing than they felt in use. My strongest flavor impression was cacao powder with just a bit of pepper around it.
George Q. (verified owner) –
The 6 x 60 needed a more deliberate light than my narrower cigars. Once underway, it delivered a broad, roasted flavor with a dry cocoa edge.
Tony M. (verified owner) –
I paid attention to how the five cigars felt before choosing one. The one I smoked was evenly packed and gave a clean, woody aftertaste.
Adam V. (verified owner) –
An early cocoa impression eventually turned woodier and darker. My sample felt uniformly packed, and the other cigars in the five-pack left room for another evening’s comparison.
Dean K. (verified owner) –
Dark-roast coffee came first and cocoa followed. The 6 x 60 called for a slow session, but the draw itself stayed easy rather than making the size feel like a chore.
Patrick D. (verified owner) –
A thicker cigar sometimes feels awkward to me, but the length balanced this one out. The darkest flavors arrived gradually rather than all at once.
Carlos P. (verified owner) –
I compared a few puffs with and without coffee beside me. The cigar’s own roasted note was still distinct when I switched to water.
Sarah W. (verified owner) –
The burn was slightly wavy without becoming a problem. I liked how a toasted-nut impression appeared between the darker coffee stretches.
Natalie Y. (verified owner) –
I treated this as a format to settle down with. Its early wood and earth eased toward coffee, and the cigar kept going without demanding much of my attention.
Samantha T. (verified owner) –
I noticed the thicker shape mainly during the first few minutes. After settling in, my attention shifted to a surprisingly quiet toasted-nut finish.
Jeff E. (verified owner) –
For the 6 x 60, shorter puffs worked better for me than strong pulls. The smoke stayed rounded and the roasted notes remained distinct.
Angela T. (verified owner) –
The first cigar left me thinking mostly about texture: dense smoke, but a relatively soft feel. The taste was more earthy than flashy.
Holly H. (verified owner) –
The last cigar I tried from this pack had a distinct toasted-walnut note. It was subtle, but clearer than the sweet flavors I had expected.
Brandon Y. (verified owner) –
This larger shape rewarded a slower rhythm on my first try. Taking longer pauses made the little cocoa accents easier for me to notice.
Elizabeth E. (verified owner) –
The opening draw on one of these was looser than I like. Slowing down helped keep the coffee flavor from becoming too sharp.
Joseph H. (verified owner) –
A clean cap cut made the bigger ring easier to get comfortable with. Most of the session tasted like toasted grain with a dark-roast background.
Peter G. (verified owner) –
Roast was the main impression rather than sweetness. Checking the cigar by hand, I didn’t find any loose sections or soft areas on this sample.