Organic Reserve Habano Pig (6″x60) 20 Cigars
Original price was: $120.00.$79.99Current price is: $79.99.
Organic Reserve Habano Pig 6″ x 60
Bold, balanced, and completely clean organic cigars The Organic Reserve Habano 6×60 is the ultimate expression of patience and purity. Handcrafted over the course of three full years, this large-gauge premium cigar is made with 100% organic tobacco, free from chemicals, additives, or artificial treatments.
Instead of pesticides, the tobacco is deep-frozen post-curing to naturally eliminate beetle larvae—preserving the leaf’s integrity and ensuring a clean, pure smoke from start to finish.
Blend Highlights:
- Cap: Pig Tail
- Wrapper: Nicaraguan Habano 2000
- Filler Nicaraguan, Dominican, and a pinch of Peruvian leaf
- Binder: Nicaraguan
- Size: 6 x 60 Gordo
- Strength: Medium
- 4,000 Cigars Only – Second Small Batch 2026 Release
- Handmade in Estelí, Nicaragua
- Quantity of 20
Tasting Notes:
Expect deep notes of earthy cocoa, dark roasted coffee, and aged cedar, with a hint of natural sweetness from the Peruvian tobacco. The draw is smooth, the burn is steady, and the finish is long and satisfying—perfect for those who appreciate complexity without harshness.
In stock
Organic Reserve Habano Pig (6″x60)
Why Smoke Organic Reserve Habano ?
- Fully organic & chemical-free
- Crafted over 4 years from seed to cigar
- Deep-frozen for natural pest protection
The Organic Reserve Habano 6×60 isn’t just a cigar—it’s a statement. A tribute to tradition. A return to how cigars were meant to be.
60 reviews for Organic Reserve Habano Pig (6″x60) 20 Cigars
Only logged in customers who have purchased this product may leave a review.
Free Shipping $150 or More For U.S. States. Canada $72.99
Related products
Kelly M. (verified owner) –
The first few puffs suggested pepper, but the body of the flavor was gentler. Toasted grain and soft wood became the recurring notes.
Allison N. (verified owner) –
The wrapper remained sound for the whole session. As for the taste, the relationship between cedar and spice was close to what I’d been looking for.
Kimberly B. (verified owner) –
I caught a mild sweetness only in the lingering finish, not on the draw. The rest of the cigar tasted distinctly savory to me.
Julie N. (verified owner) –
I found the smoke denser than the flavor initially felt. Once it settled into the session, the nuttiness caught up and became clearer.
David F. (verified owner) –
I expected sweetness from the aroma but found very little in the flavor. Instead, there was dry wood with a warm, nutty finish.
Brian H. (verified owner) –
The wider Habano had a controlled draw after a shallow cut. I noticed warm cedar first, followed by something closer to roasted cashew.
Samantha C. (verified owner) –
The cigar kept its structure when I carefully removed the band. A faint buttery texture appeared around then, although the taste remained savory.
Laura I. (verified owner) –
The draw on my 6 x 60 stayed fairly constant as it shortened. Flavor moved gradually from toast toward a drier almond-like finish.
Marty X. (verified owner) –
There was just enough pepper at the end to keep the profile from being too mellow. The draw’s light resistance also suited my taste.
Kimberly T. (verified owner) –
The 6 x 60 finished less peppery than it began on my palate. Dry toast lingered after the wood flavor started to fade.
David W. (verified owner) –
I expected the flavor to get progressively sharper, but it softened instead. The middle reminded me of browned bread with a trace of cedar.
Diana Z. (verified owner) –
I found the bigger shape easier to hold once I stopped gripping it tightly. The smoke stayed soft in texture while the cedar flavor grew clearer.
Alex Q. (verified owner) –
The cedar and spice were balanced to my taste. Once I adopted a slower pace, the wider ring gauge felt comfortable, and the wrapper stayed intact throughout.
Danielle Y. (verified owner) –
A little earthiness helped balance the wood against the spice. The burn was consistent enough that watching it stopped being part of the session.
Russ M. (verified owner) –
The thicker shape felt natural after a few minutes, with clear wood and slight sweetness behind it. A small uneven burn patch needed correcting, which keeps my score at four.
Richard D. (verified owner) –
I liked the middle’s combination of roasted nuts and a creamy touch. Airflow was a shade looser than my ideal, leaving me at four stars despite enjoying the flavor.
Joseph V. (verified owner) –
The larger format fit the relaxed session I’d planned. Cedar and spice came through in the balance I had been hoping to find.
Adam J. (verified owner) –
A faint floral aroma floated up while this Habano rested. The taste was more grounded in dry wood and lightly roasted grain.
Andrew D. (verified owner) –
My main impression was warm, savory grain rather than sweetness. Pepper added a dry edge without masking the quieter roasted-nut taste.
Thomas Q. (verified owner) –
I noticed a cashew-like impression when I kept my pace slow. Faster puffs made the pepper more obvious and hid some of that detail.
Kelly S. (verified owner) –
After lighting, the cigar needed very little from me. I took my time, found more nuttiness in the finish, and wouldn’t put this format into a hurried break.
Daniel X. (verified owner) –
The larger format let a restrained floral aroma appear and fade without being rushed. On the palate, the flavor stayed much more nutty than floral.
Tony Q. (verified owner) –
A clean seam stayed closed as the cigar shortened. The finish picked up a little spice without losing its earlier warm-bread character.
Greg I. (verified owner) –
The final section dried out my palate more than I liked. The earlier creamy texture and roasted-grain flavor had been the better part for me.
David B. (verified owner) –
The opening’s sharper edge rounded off as the toasted notes developed. The progression felt gradual rather than like a sudden change of character.
Natalie Z. (verified owner) –
A quick break wouldn’t have suited this format for me. Its straightforward wood-and-spice profile worked best when I left a little time between each draw.
Nick U. (verified owner) –
I normally choose something smaller, but I liked this change. The flavor also developed more depth than the first few puffs had led me to expect.
Ashley G. (verified owner) –
There was a bread-crust note hiding under the opening spice. It became much easier to recognize after the first part had burned away.
Jeff Q. (verified owner) –
This 6 x 60 had a pleasant difference between taste and aroma. The aroma was faintly sweet, while the taste was dry and woody.
Paul X. (verified owner) –
The first stretch had a grassy edge that faded into warm toast. I found the change easier to follow once I stopped taking big puffs.
Jennifer O. (verified owner) –
I found the width less noticeable once the draw rhythm felt natural. A quiet almond note kept returning behind the steady cedar.
Christine N. (verified owner) –
I noticed a little creaminess well before I picked out any sweetness. The underlying flavor remained savory, with grain and wood doing most of the work.
Holly O. (verified owner) –
There was more depth beyond the first few puffs than those puffs suggested. I’d take the dependable airflow I found here over a more elaborate presentation.
Jennifer U. (verified owner) –
The wrapper around the cap stayed intact despite the broad cut. I noticed a woody aroma and a little creamy texture through the middle.
Christina H. (verified owner) –
The opening puffs had some liveliness without feeling sharp. A small amount of resistance in the draw matched exactly what I prefer.
Dean J. (verified owner) –
The thicker shape felt comfortable after an initial adjustment. Warm wood and restrained pepper made up the easygoing profile, and the burn didn’t stray enough to need a correction.
Marty C. (verified owner) –
The 6 x 60 looked hefty beside my usual cigar, but the flavor wasn’t blunt. A delicate toasted-almond impression kept showing up underneath the wood.
Steve W. (verified owner) –
I didn’t need a forceful pull to get a full impression of the taste. The gentler draws brought out more bread crust than pepper.
Elizabeth M. (verified owner) –
I noticed how long the warm cedar aroma stayed around the resting cigar. Its actual aftertaste was more almond-like and comparatively quiet.
Carol A. (verified owner) –
By midway, warm cedar had become a lasting part of the flavor. This wasn’t a format I’d select when a break had to be rushed.
Jeff B. (verified owner) –
Roasted nuts appeared after the opening minutes. The burn kept moving steadily on its own. I eventually stopped concentrating on it.
Carol L. (verified owner) –
I let the large foot catch evenly before settling in. The flavor began dry and woody, then gained a soft bread-like note.
Victoria T. (verified owner) –
The larger dimensions were different from my usual choice in a way I enjoyed. Smoke output was consistent from the beginning, carrying clear wood with faint sweetness behind it.
Amber L. (verified owner) –
The spice was animated without becoming a harsh undertone to everything else. Giving up on hurrying made the larger size work better for me.
Carol D. (verified owner) –
The ash held across the broad face without dropping unexpectedly. By the midpoint, I was tasting mostly warm bread and a little dry wood.
Jeff K. (verified owner) –
The broad body felt firm without obvious hard spots. Mine produced a rounded aroma that contrasted with its fairly dry cedar taste.
Greg R. (verified owner) –
The initial puffs were lively without an abrasive edge. After that, I could follow the smoke without having to keep tending to the cigar.
Tim F. (verified owner) –
The larger ring wasn’t as comfortable in my hand as a narrower cigar. I enjoyed the cedar flavor, but the size took conscious adjustment.
Samantha I. (verified owner) –
A gentle sweetness surfaced from time to time rather than staying constant. Settling into a slower rhythm also helped me get along with the wider ring gauge.
Melissa L. (verified owner) –
The middle felt almost creamy despite a mostly dry flavor. That softened the toasted wood enough that I could pick out a small grain-like sweetness.
Jeff S. (verified owner) –
The wide burn line drifted on one side and needed adjusting. I liked the warm nut flavor, though the extra attention kept it from being completely relaxing.
Dan K. (verified owner) –
I liked the wider dimensions more after slowing down. The first several draws had been active in flavor without giving me a sharp sensation.
Stephanie K. (verified owner) –
The wider ring gave a generous amount of smoke from a gentle draw. A quiet nutty finish stood apart from the opening pepper.
Adam G. (verified owner) –
The size made more sense after I quit trying to rush. A quiet sweetness appeared occasionally, and my sample felt evenly constructed with no loose or soft section.
Anthony M. (verified owner) –
My notes stayed fairly consistent until the last section, when cedar became more pronounced. The earlier portions had leaned toward roasted nuts and toast.
Erin W. (verified owner) –
I gave the substantial 6 x 60 the time its size called for. At that pace, I noticed the finish leaning a little further toward nuts.
George C. (verified owner) –
Wood was the clearer flavor, with a warm bread-like taste further behind it. I approached the 6 x 60 as a substantial format rather than a brief smoke.
Julie F. (verified owner) –
A leisurely pace helped the larger ring gauge feel right and kept the smoke cool. The spice remained lively without turning the overall experience harsh.
Mark M. (verified owner) –
The larger Habano changed slowly enough that I could compare its early and late flavors. Cedar became toast, then finished woodier again.
Peter E. (verified owner) –
The cap cut neatly and gave me the draw I wanted. From around the middle onward, a warm cedar flavor stayed present.